Monday, May 30, 2005
"Monkey see monkey do": the essence of education. Education must begin to teach "thinking". Thinking is the ability to do things your own way, to choose for yourself what you want to believe in, and moreover to leave the pack and your following self, overcoming, finding within yourself a leader to lead another pack of monkey-see-monkey-do-ers. This involves a sort of invention or creation, which may not even be possible. This is why thinking is always a trying to think. It is simply realizing this that breaks one out of the pattern of repetition. The student never repays the teacher if he himself never becomes...a teacher.
Please Shut Up!
A conversation that ended before it began? Is it possible? Haven't you experienced it? As if the conversation had already taken place even though it never took place. As if resolution was achieved and it didn't need to be spoken about, even though it never was spoken about in the first place: we just knew what to do; we just knew what we thought; we just knew. But do you have to anticipate the conversation to arrive at this state, and hence both would have to have the conversation with themselves to just know? The conversation is a pointless one as it could never lead to anywhere that hasn't already been established, resolved. It would only serve to annoy.
Can "That I die" change the essence of human nature?
To be alive is already to be dead, is the only way we can be dead.
To die the prerequisite is that we are or have been alive.
Notice the similarities in To die and Tode (German) and in Mortality and Mortalite (French). Death is one and perhaps the only "idea" that translates perfectly from person to person even over different languages. We all realize we will die. I will die. Perhaps we understand death differently according to our culture and education (we can even want it, according to our genetics), but the tragic or blissful thought THAT I will die is universally acknowledged and has to form the basis of a community that peacefully shares in a mutual wanting to avoid our deaths. But the fear of the anxiety that the thinking of death causes causes us to avoid thinking this basis, thinking this commonality that unites. Without this thinking we cannot share, and we certainly cannot give without expecting or desiring return, something that this thinking can give way to as a general feeling in the worldspirit.
But the question of human nature comes down to one thought:
We are by nature selfish, that is, all actions are essentially and ultimately selfish actions, unless it can be said that SOME humans will TRY to do good and benficial things for others that have no gain for themselves, and fail, and keep trying, endlessly, never giving up. For they cannot even gain the satisfaction with themselves of having done these things for others without having similar good things done in return. Is this possible? I don't think so, but we will never know.
To die the prerequisite is that we are or have been alive.
Notice the similarities in To die and Tode (German) and in Mortality and Mortalite (French). Death is one and perhaps the only "idea" that translates perfectly from person to person even over different languages. We all realize we will die. I will die. Perhaps we understand death differently according to our culture and education (we can even want it, according to our genetics), but the tragic or blissful thought THAT I will die is universally acknowledged and has to form the basis of a community that peacefully shares in a mutual wanting to avoid our deaths. But the fear of the anxiety that the thinking of death causes causes us to avoid thinking this basis, thinking this commonality that unites. Without this thinking we cannot share, and we certainly cannot give without expecting or desiring return, something that this thinking can give way to as a general feeling in the worldspirit.
But the question of human nature comes down to one thought:
We are by nature selfish, that is, all actions are essentially and ultimately selfish actions, unless it can be said that SOME humans will TRY to do good and benficial things for others that have no gain for themselves, and fail, and keep trying, endlessly, never giving up. For they cannot even gain the satisfaction with themselves of having done these things for others without having similar good things done in return. Is this possible? I don't think so, but we will never know.
Sunday, May 01, 2005
Random Blurbs
To conceal the revealed only requires a forgetting, a moving on that loses the previous to the new: the unconcealed must be kept safe in its unconcealedness. How does the concealed become revealed? Mustn't it be the unconcealed potential-to-be-unconcealed and not the strictly concealed, that can never be revealed, if it ever becomes the unconcealed? That is, mustn't the concealed always remain concealed? But we begin to see things show themselves as revealed in the revealing that must and can only be an interpretation of seeing the concealed as being unconcealed in its very being concealed.
I have all I need,
But I have not done
All I need to do.
Warm not hot,
Pain sets in,
I should sleep,
And I will.
I have all I need,
But I have not done
All I need to do.
Warm not hot,
Pain sets in,
I should sleep,
And I will.
